<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cash received for Advanced Nutraceuticals (ANII)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/</link>
	<description>Because you shouldn't need an MBA to be savvy about finance and business</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:14:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Experiments in Finance&#8217;s Take on Contributor&#8217;s Corner - Fat Pitch Financials</title>
		<link>http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/comment-page-1/#comment-4161</link>
		<dc:creator>Experiments in Finance&#8217;s Take on Contributor&#8217;s Corner - Fat Pitch Financials</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2006 15:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/#comment-4161</guid>
		<description>[...] Ricemutt signed up as a paying member of Fat Pitch Financials Contributor&#8217;s Corner a few months ago and asked me if she could write about her experience. I agreed and she posted an article detailing her first ever special situation investment (Advanced Nutraceuticals) based on information posted in Contributor&#8217;s Corner. This past Thursday Ricemutt posted the results of her experiment. I&#8217;m happy and proud to report that Fat Pitch Financials Contributor&#8217;s Corner helped Ricemutt earn $259.51, a 14.9% gain. She calculated that her investment had an annualized return of 176.4% (APY). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ricemutt signed up as a paying member of Fat Pitch Financials Contributor&#8217;s Corner a few months ago and asked me if she could write about her experience. I agreed and she posted an article detailing her first ever special situation investment (Advanced Nutraceuticals) based on information posted in Contributor&#8217;s Corner. This past Thursday Ricemutt posted the results of her experiment. I&#8217;m happy and proud to report that Fat Pitch Financials Contributor&#8217;s Corner helped Ricemutt earn $259.51, a 14.9% gain. She calculated that her investment had an annualized return of 176.4% (APY). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ricemutt</title>
		<link>http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/comment-page-1/#comment-3801</link>
		<dc:creator>Ricemutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/#comment-3801</guid>
		<description>There was some debate about this on the special situations investing site. 

You can either calculate annualized return based on a compounded (CAGR) basis, which would have made the annualized return more like 176.4%. (To see this, use the CAGR calculator under the &quot;Online calculators&quot; link on the right sidebar of this site and enter in initial=1736.49, final=1996, years of investment=50 days/365 days=0.137 and hit &quot;Calculate&quot;). 

But that assumes that you&#039;re compounding and able to reinvest the total amount you receive each time at the same rate again, each period. 

If you don&#039;t assume that and merely annualize the rate, then you&#039;d take 14.9% and multiply by 7.3 (=365 days/50 days) to get 108.8%. This ignores compounding and basically says that I got 14.9% over 50 days, but at that same rate, if I had held it for a full year, I&#039;d have made 108.8%. All theoretical numbers only meaningful for rough comparisons, of course!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There was some debate about this on the special situations investing site. </p>
<p>You can either calculate annualized return based on a compounded (CAGR) basis, which would have made the annualized return more like 176.4%. (To see this, use the CAGR calculator under the &#8220;Online calculators&#8221; link on the right sidebar of this site and enter in initial=1736.49, final=1996, years of investment=50 days/365 days=0.137 and hit &#8220;Calculate&#8221;). </p>
<p>But that assumes that you&#8217;re compounding and able to reinvest the total amount you receive each time at the same rate again, each period. </p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t assume that and merely annualize the rate, then you&#8217;d take 14.9% and multiply by 7.3 (=365 days/50 days) to get 108.8%. This ignores compounding and basically says that I got 14.9% over 50 days, but at that same rate, if I had held it for a full year, I&#8217;d have made 108.8%. All theoretical numbers only meaningful for rough comparisons, of course!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ronbo</title>
		<link>http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/comment-page-1/#comment-3800</link>
		<dc:creator>ronbo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2006 17:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.experiglot.com/2006/10/05/cash-received-for-advanced-nutraceuticals-anii/#comment-3800</guid>
		<description>How did you calculate your annualized return?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you calculate your annualized return?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching 2/8 queries in 0.003 seconds using disk
Object Caching 210/213 objects using disk

Served from: www.experiglot.com @ 2010-09-08 09:51:18 -->